A few things that should be considered by Navisworks users during clash detection
Navisworks is a great contribution of Autodesk for
design and construction professionals which can thoroughly review and examine
3D models developed for representing the design of different building
disciplines. Prior to the presence of Navisworks there was no such software
that had the potential to examine even the integrated 3D models which are
developed by coordinating all the multidiscipline models. This software is
purposely designed by Autodesk to sort out the problems of design and
construction professionals when it comes to improving their accuracy by
identifying design inconsistencies between them.
Apart from helping in identifying clashes between
model elements it is also used by AEC professionals for developing simulation
videos that are used for showing step by step method of construction.
Simulation videos are extremely crucial for design and construction
professionals for keeping themselves aware about the step by step construction
process.
Now coming to the point, what are those things that
should be remembered by Navisworks users when they execute clash detection services in Navisworks? There are quite a few things that
should be taken seriously by users for accomplishing clash detection services.
The first thing would be creating viewpoints which incorporate comments, measurements
and markups etc that are very necessary for users to understand the
technicalities of clashes. Without creating viewpoints Navisworks users won’t
be able to deal properly with clashes identified during the process. Without the assistance of markups and
comments Navisworks users would find it difficult to sort out the clashes.
Viewpoints must be organized systematically or into sensible hierarchies so
that effective workflow can be created for the rectification of clashes.
Navisworks users must understand the gravity of the clashes in relation to
their ability to harm or affect the project in question. Navisworks must have
clarity about hard clashes and soft clashes and they should be provided with
appropriate solutions depending upon their seriousness. But it doesn’t indicate
that soft clashes should not be rectified instead it means that hard clashes
should be given the priority since they can have adverse effect on the project.
And finally the results of clash tests must be
studied properly by the users and it is mandatory for them to organize the
results properly so that appropriate solutions can be provided for them.
Comments
Post a Comment